Cement Placement and Evaluation - Progress in Last 10 years
Recorded on March 18, 2014 (90 minutes)

Select a Webinar Format:
 On-Demand Archive
       $0.00 for Registrant

The main objective of a primary cement job is to provide complete and permanent isolation of the formations behind the casing. To do this, cement must displace all mud from the annulus. After having used rules of thumb or semi-empirical models to design this displacement process for years the industry started to use displacement simulators in the late 90s. The most significant improvements made regarding these numerical simulations over the last years will be presented and the practical limitations of these new simulators discussed. Since the eccentricity of the casing is playing a key role on this process it will also be attempted to answer to the following question: how accurate are the predictions of the casing inside the hole and how might this  impact the quality of cement placement?

Designing cement placement with a reliable simulator does not guarantee that uncontaminated cement will be uniformly distributed in the annulus and bonded to the casing and formation. Acoustic logging has become the industry’s tool of choice for detecting cement behind casing and assessing the quality of the bond. During the last ten years new techniques were introduced like LWD sonic and measurements based on flexural wave propagation. The added value and limitations of these techniques will be compared to those of the more conventional sonic and ultrasonic techniques.  The benefit of data integration in the overall cement evaluation process will be discussed.

Gunnar DeBruijn
Schlumberger

DeBruijn has 24 years of experience working in the oil industry, mostly in cementing. He has worked across Canada, North America and in Deepwater around the world supporting cementing and well integrity initiatives in almost every well environment: Arctic, CBM, CSS, Deepwater, ERD Heavy Oil, Horizontal, HPHT, Offshore, SAGD and Shale Gas wells. Gunnar received a B.Sc. in Mechanical Engineering in 1990 at the University of Alberta. He is registered as an SPE Professional, and a Professional Engineer in Texas, and Canada. Gunnar also contributes regularly to API Standards as a member of Subcommittee 10 on Well Cements. He is also active on standards such as API RP 90-1, API RP 90-2, API RP 96, API Bul. 97 which are relevant to Well Integrity.